Law and Disorder Radio – Vivek Chibber on Imperialism in the American Century – Guantanamo Lawyers Accused of Smuggling Underwear to Clients – Hosts: Dalia Hashad, Heidi Boghosian, Michael Steven Smith & Michael Ratner – Produced by Geoff Brady

Law and Disorder Radio

 

Imperialism in the American Century.

Recently recorded at the Brecht Forum, Vivek Chibber, professor of sociology at NYU and the author of Locked in Place: State-Building and Late Industrialization in India.

His speech is titled Imperialism in the American Century. Vivek describes what progressives can expect in the near future in terms of basic principles of justice. Vivek also references how the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) draft is shaping foreign policy.

 

 

 

Co-hosts Heidi Boghosian and Michael Smith discuss the recent news – The military is accusing two attorneys for Guantanamo detainees of smuggling underwear to their clients. Michael and Heidi also read the two letters detailing the dispute. Read Shane Kadidal’s blog post here: Underwear Gnomes Infest Guantanamo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Ratner’s letter published in the New York Times Oct. 10, 2007 – Torture and the Shame of a Nation, responding to this New York Times Editorial: On Torture and American Values

To the Editor: “On Torture and American Values” lets Congress off the hook too easily regarding the torture and secret detention program. As with the Iraq war, many Republicans and Democrats were and still are willing to be misled (or claim to have been so) rather than appear to be perceived as weak on terrorism. Sadly, Congress by its actions and inactions is the handmaiden of the torture program. Despite the publicly revealed memos authorizing torture and the testimony of its widespread use, Congress, even under the Democrats, has yet to hold even one hearing regarding the responsibility of high administration officials. Perhaps had it done so, the administration would not have felt emboldened to continue the program.Instead, Congress affirmatively aided the torture program. Examples abound: removing habeas corpus from detainees and failing in its restoration (habeas is key to protecting against torture — lawyers and courts have access to detainees); granting amnesty to officials who may have violated the torture and war crimes provisions of our law; allowing a defense for future abusers if they relied upon legal advice; authorizing the president to redefine cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment; and permitting the use of evidence derived from torture and coercion.Now with the nomination of a new attorney general, Congress again has an opportunity to make its voice heard: no attorney general who does not clearly and unequivocally repudiate the new torture memos and the secret sites at which torture is carried out should even be considered for the job.

Michael Ratner, President of the Center for Constitutional Rights