Re: The Future of Iraq’s Oil – Letter to the Editor, NY Times (unpublished) – PDF

2003 Iraq Letter to the Editor

To the Editor

Re: “The Future of Iraq’s Oil” (editorial, April 11)

It is not only the right principle to use Iraq’s oil to benefit its people, it is required by the Hague and Geneva Conventions. The occupying countries are viewed as trustees of Iraq’s oil. They can only obtain oil from wells that currently exist. They are not permitted to drill new wells or explore and exploit new oil fields. Nor can the U.S. abrogate existing oil contracts–at least not without paying compensation. Effectively, this means the U.S. and its allies cannot award new long-term oil contracts. This was the U.S. position with regard to Israel’s claim that it could grant oil development concessions in Sinai and the Gulf of Suez.

The proceeds from oil are to be used for the benefit of the population. While some would argue that this includes paying for the occupation, it does not include paying the costs of the war. Hopefully, the U.S. and its allies will adhere to these international requirements.

Michael Ratner


Center for Constitutional Rights


Text of Editorial

The Future of Iraq’s Oil

APRIL 11, 2003

Iraq is no longer a republic of fear, but it is still a republic of oil. Some 112 billion barrels lie beneath its soil, more than a tenth of the world’s known reserves. How the Bush administration handles the management of that resource as it gains control of the country will go a long way toward determining not just the future of Iraq but also America’s worldwide reputation. Any effort to manipulate Iraq’s oil for the benefit of the United States and American oil companies rather than the benefit of the Iraqi people will squander whatever political gains Washington has won in the war.

Thanks to good planning and quick military action, coalition forces secured Iraq’s southern oil fields before they could be sabotaged, and the allies are now establishing control over northern oil areas as well. If they, too, are captured intact, limited oil production may resume in a few months.

In the short term, oil revenues must be used to provide for the humanitarian needs of a population that has suffered from almost 13 years of sanctions and more than three weeks of wartime dislocation. They should not be used to pay for the costs of the war, but should be used to help build a livable peace. In the longer term, the future of the Iraqi oil industry, including its possible privatization, must be decided by the Iraqi people themselves once a legitimate, internationally recognized new government has been established.

The Bush administration has repeatedly pledged that Iraq’s oil wealth will be used exclusively to benefit the Iraqi people. That is the right principle. By adhering to it, Washington can dispel lingering suspicions about America’s motives for invading Iraq. But with tens of billions of dollars at stake, there are likely to be heavy pressures from interested parties to lock up lucrative long-range contracts during the period of American occupation. There will also be proposals for using Iraq’s oil production capacity to break the power of OPEC, which was founded in Baghdad in 1960.

Iraq’s oil sales are still governed by the international sanctions imposed after its 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Current rules require that all sales must be made through the United Nations, which also controls how the resulting revenues can be spent. Oil exports halted when the invasion began, but the U.N. secretary general, Kofi Annan, has temporary authority to spend the billions of dollars on hand from recent exports for emergency relief.

Before Iraq invaded Kuwait, it produced around 3.5 million barrels of oil per day. The rate had fallen to about 2 million barrels per day before the war began last month. Iraqi oil is of high quality, cheap to produce and abundant. But repeated wars and sanctions have dried up oil exploration and investment. New investment will be needed to restore and possibly expand production.

By developing its oil wealth on an equitable basis and shedding the expensive burdens of militarism and dictatorship, Iraq can exceed the prosperity it briefly knew a quarter-century ago. America should direct its occupation efforts toward achieving that goal.